Current Year


Please go to our new website for updated information!





2017-2018 Scientific Meetings

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION FOR ALL LEARNERS: None of the planners and presenters of this program have any relevant financial information to disclose.

October 3, 2017
Beyond the binary of sex: Psychoanalytic exploration of multiple sexualities
Presenter: Jack Drescher
Discussant: Patricia Gherovici

This presentation and discussion will focus on psychoanalytic reflections the multiplicity of gender that we increasingly observe in clinical practice. Dr Drescher will present from his vast experience with gender variance and the DSM. Dr Gherovici provocatively takes the thesis that ‘psychoanalysis needs a sex change’ as she argues that psychoanalysis’ homophobic and transphobic history is based on a selective reinterpretation of the Freudian texts. This presentation will aim to understand the new trends, and the concepts necessary to make sense of what is happening with sex and gender in our contemporary world as well as reflecting on the implications for clinical psychoanalysis.

Patricia Gherovici, Ph.D. is a psychoanalyst and analytic supervisor, co-founder and director of the Philadelphia Lacan Group. She the author of The Puerto Rican Syndrome and Please Select Your Gender: From the Invention of Hysteria to the Democratizing of Transgenderism. She has published two edited collections (both with Manya Steinkoler), Lacan On Madness: Madness, Yes You Can’t and Lacan, Psychoanalysis and Comedy. Her new book Transgender Psychoanalysis: A Lacanian Perspective on Sexual Difference is forthcoming by Routledge in June 2017.

Learning Objectives: After the lecture the participant should be able to
1. Describe the new trends, and the concepts related to sex and gender in our contemporary world and the implications of these changes for clinical psychoanalysis.
2. Understand and appreciate gender variance and the history of GID diagnosis as well as the psychoanalytic debates about sex and gender.

November 7, 2017
Entering One’s own life as an Aim of Clinical Psychoanalysis
Presenter: Ricchardo Lombardi
Discussant: Christine Anzieu-Premmereur

The historical development of psychoanalysis has demonstrated that the aim of our clinical work may change as the patient population changes. Dr Lombardi hypothesizes that one of the main tasks of psychoanalytic working through today is to help our difficult patients, who are trapped in imitative dynamics and so-called “never-to-be-born selves,” enter a life of their own. Particular emphasis is given to activating a body-mind relationship, catalyzing the emergence from the unrepressed unconscious, and constructing space-time parameters in relation to the most primitive and undifferentiated emotional experiences.

Riccardo Lombardi, MD is training analyst of the Italian Psychoanalytic Society and the author of the books Formless Infinity: Clinical Explorations of Matte Blanco and Bion, and Body-Mind Dissociation in Psychoanalysis. Development after Bion. He has a full time private practice in Rome.

Learning Objectives: After the lecture the participant should be able to
1) Understand in severely disturbed patients how the sensory perceptions arising from the body are the first expressions of self-consciousness; to help the analyst in catalyzing the patient’s integration with his deepest levels of mental functioning.
2) Describe the importance that the body holds, especially in relation to the deepest areas of mental functioning.

December 5, 2017
Who is the analyst in Lacanian, Ego-Object relations and Self psychological approaches
Presenters: David Lichtenstein, Andrew Lotterman Jeff Halpern
Interviews by Diana Moga and Elhav Weinstein

This panel will focus on how an object relations analyst, self psychologist and Lacanian psychoanalyst differ as the one who occupies the analytic object for the patient. Psychoanalysis has progressively come to favor similarities, blurring differences among various psychoanalytic schools of thought despite the conflictual debates among their predecessors. In this panel, by asking specific questions about each presenter’s work, Diana Moga and Elhav Weinstein will focus on delineating the differences among these theoretical approaches. Clinical material will be presented by way of illustration.

David Lichtenstein is a psychoanalyst in private practice in New York City and a member of the faculty at CUNY Graduate Center, the New School University, a co-founder, faculty member, and supervisor at Apres-Coup Psychoanalytic Association in New York. He is the editor of Division/Review: A Quarterly Psychoanalytic Forum, author of numerous articles and book chapters and the co-editor of The “Lacan Tradition” published by Karnac in 2017.

Dr. Andrew Lotterman is a training and supervising Psychoanalyst at the Columbia Psychoanalytic Center in private practice in New York City. In addition to psychoanalysis, he has a specialty in the psychotherapy of schizophrenic patients. Among his numerous presentations and publications, Dr Lotterman published a book entitled Specific Techniques for the Psychotherapy of Schizophrenic Patients by International Universities Press in 1996.

Dr Jeff Halpern is a training and supervising analyst at the Columbia University Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research. He is Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. He teaches, supervises and practices in New York City.

Learning Objectives: After the lecture the participant should be able to
1) Conceptualize basic psychoanalytic notions such as the unconscious, the self, what constitutes therapeutic action, the nature of trauma, the work of interpretation, and the role of the analytic relationship.
2) Delineate main differences in theory and technique between a lacanian, an object relations and self psychological approach.

January 9, 2018
Different structural organizations of the transference in working with neurotic, narcissistic and borderline patients
Presenters: Otto Kernberg and Eve Caligor

Drs Kernberg and Caligor will present from their vast experience in working with borderline and narcissistic patients and share their expertise on different structural organizations of the transference in working with the most difficult cases.

Learning Objectives: After the lecture the participant should be able to
1. Understand and be able to discuss how Kernberg applies contemporary psychoanalytic object relations theory to a classification of psychoanalytic techniques in terms of four fundamental technical interventions: interpretation, transference analysis, technical neutrality and countertransference.
2. Understand and be able to discuss how Kernberg applies this classification of psychoanalytic interventions to specific structural organizations of the transference, based on the application of object relations theory to the activation of particular internalized object relations in the transference.

February 6, 2018
‘Trumpism.’ The symptom of our times
Presenters: Paola Mieli and Peter Bratsis

Freud defined a symptom as “a sign of, and a substitute for, an instinctual satisfaction which has remained in abeyance; it is a consequence of the process of repression.” Many have commended on Trumpism as a symptom of America’s dark side; the return of repressed racism, xenophobia, misogyny, etc. New York Times columnist Charles Blow described Trumpism as “a religion founded on patriarchy and white supremacy.” This meeting will bring together a psychoanalyst and a political scientist to discuss Trumpism as the symptom of our times.

Paola Mieli is a practicing psychoanalyst and the founder and president of Après-Coup Psychoanalytic Association. The author of numerous articles on psychoanalysis and on culture published in Europe and America, her books include: Figures of Space. Subject, Body, Place (Agincourt Press, New York, 2017); A Silver Martian–Normality and Segregation in Primo Levi’s Sleeping Beauty in the Fridge (PLC, New York) 2014; Being Human: The Technological Extensions of the Body (Co-Editor, Marsilio Publishers, New York, 1999).
Peter Bratsis is a political scientist, currently on the faculty at BMCC. He has taught at the University of Salford, the London School of Economics, Brooklyn College, and Queens College. His research mainly concerns the categories and ideas that our political world is based upon and how these ideas are created and reproduced. He is the author of Everyday Life and the State and, with Stanley Aronowitz of Paradigm Lost: State Theory Reconsidered.

March 6, 2018
Liebert Award Lecture: Sex, text, ur-text, intertext: Freud’s Dora and the poisonous book
Presenter: Adele Tutter

Replete with books, encyclopedias, postcards, and letters, Freud’s case history of Dora implicates themes of illicit and covert desires and their inscription in texts– a textual preoccupation that overrides its superficial disavowal of social concerns that texts can function as dangerous instruments of corruption. The “poisonous book” is in fact a prominent leitmotif in the modern novel, from Don Quixote to Portrait of Dorian Gray; one such novel, Émile Zola’s 1877 Une page d’amour, anticipates and may have suggested two of Dora’s subtextual themes: the erotics of knowing and the dialectics of reality, condensed within the theme of textual suggestion. The intertextual study of Dora and its ur-texts articulates the felt tension between the therapeutic potential of knowing at the heart of Freud’s project, and the destructive potential of corruptive suggestion and erotic desire to undermine and destroy it.

April 3, 2018
Rethinking the death instinct
Presenters: Bob Michels and Jonathan House discussion with Joel Whitebook

Drs Michels and House will take the chapter “Making Sense of the Death Instinct” of Joel Whitebook’s recent book Freud: An intellectual Biography as a point of reference in order to discuss their current views on the death instinct and its relevance to clinical practice.

May 1, 2018
Rado Lecture: Emerging Adulthood: Mental life, development and 21st century culture
Karen Gilmore, MD
In 2000, Jeffrey Arnett, a developmental research psychologist, proposed a new phase of development which he called “emerging adulthood.” He delineated specific developmental challenges for this age group, centered on identity, role exploration, and subjective experience, and offered a theoretical frame that broadly linked his observations to changes in contemporary society. This proposal elicited an extraordinary response in the research community, generating hundreds of thousands of publications in the US and across the globe, a professional society and a journal dedicated to this age group. In contrast, the reaction among psychoanalysts has been both slow in coming and lukewarm. There are a number of explanations for this tepid response: adult development has historically attracted the interest of only a few psychoanalysts whose contributions to the literature peaked in the 1980s and 1990s; similarly, identity has never achieved full psychoanalytic status despite its introduction and elaboration by a world-renowned psychoanalyst. In this paper, I will argue that both adulthood and identity merit psychoanalytic legitimacy and theoretical elaboration as complex aspects of self-representation with deep personal meaning. Moreover, the broader idea of emerging adulthood begs to be studied, not only as a possible new phase of development but as a rich example of the dynamic interface of mental life, culture and developmental progression.

June 5, 2018
The pleasure of technology
Presenter: Ben Fong
Discussant: Kevin Kelly

Dr Fong, from a Lacanian-Lowaldian-Marcusian perspective, will present on drive gratification and the contemporary technological lure. He explores the attraction we all have towards technological manipulations of our lives, towards the internet for example.

For more information please contact:
Dr Vaia Tsolas
Program chair